Amendment 27

Amendment XXVII

No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.


It means that Congress can't raise their own pay. When they vote for a pay raise, it can't go into effect until the next session of Congress.



It was one of the 12 original amendments proposed to the US Constitution. The first 10 became the bill of rights; the 27th amendment floated around for 200 years before finally being ratified in 1992.

 

 

 

Do you feel this is a fair amendment? Is it enforced?

 

 

 

Is there a better way to enforce this amendment?

 

Amendment 26

Amendment XXVI

Section 1.

The right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age.

Section 2.

The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.




Voting Statistics:

Statistic Verification

Source: U.S Census Bureau : Voting and Registration

Date Verified: 2.6.2012

Voter Registration Statistics	Data
Total number of Americans eligible to vote	206,072,000
Total number of Americans registered to vote	146,311,000
Total number of Americans who voted in the 2008 Presidential election	131,144,000
Percent of Americans who voted in the 2008 Presidential election	64 %
State with the highest voter turnout rate (Minnesota)	75 %
State with the lowest voter turnout rate (Utah)	53.1 %
Voter Registration by Demographics	Percent
Male	69.1
Female	72.8
White	73.5
Black	69.7
Asian	55.3
Hispanic	59.4
Age 18 to 24	58.5
Age 25 to 34	66.4
Age 35 to 44	69.9
Age 45 to 54	73.5
Age 55 to 64	76.6
Age 65 to 74	78.1
Age 75 or older	76.6
Less than high school graduate	50.5
High school graduate	64.1
Some college	75.3
Bachelor’s degree	81.2
Advanced degree	85.8
Income less than $20,000	63.7
$20,000 to $29,999	67.1
$30,000 to $39,999	71.1
$40,000 to $49,999	72.6
$50,000 to $74,999	78.2
$75,000 to $99,999	81.9
$100,000 and over	79.6
Owns home	74.5
Rents home	60.1
Top Reasons Cited for Not Voting
Too busy conflicting schedule	17.5
Illness or disability	14.9
Not interested	13.4
Did not like candidates or campaign issues	12.9
Other	11.3
Out of town	8.8
Don’t know	7
Registration problems	6
Inconvienient polling place	2.7
Transportation problems	2.6
Forgot	2.6
Bad weather	0.2

 

From seeing the stats do you feel as though the youth are taking advantage of their opportunity to take part in their government?

Why or why not?

 

 

 

How can we as a people raise the percentage of votes across the different demographics that are low?

Amendment 25

Amendment XXV

Section 1.

In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

Section 2.

Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

Section 3.

Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

Section 4.

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.





Fun Facts:

1. Who's next in line for president? The main purpose of the 25th Amendment is to describe what will happen if the current commander in chief is unable to fulfill his or her duties. The first section of the amendment states that if the president dies while in office, resigns, or is removed by Congress, then the vice president will take over. Though not specified in the 25th Amendment, next in the line of succession under federal law are the Speaker of the House, the President pro tempore of the Senate, and then presidential cabinet secretaries beginning with the Secretary of State.
2. Who'll replace the vice president? Along with providing direction for who'll replace the president, the 25th Amendment also tells us how a vice-presidential vacancy will be filled. If the vice president vacates his position during his term, the president will nominate a replacement. Congress must then confirm the nominee before he or she can take office.
3. What is a president's written declaration? If the president feels like he or she is unable to perform the duties of the office, the president can submit a written declaration to Congress and the vice president will take over as commander in chief. This clause of the 25th Amendment was used by President Richard Nixon when he resigned from office and Vice President Gerald Ford took over, the Ford Library Museum explains.
4. What section of the 25th Amendment has never been used? If you're a fan of "The West Wing," you may remember the episode exploring the issues of the fourth clause of the 25th Amendment. The last clause of the amendment gives the vice president and Congress the ability to remove the president if the commander in chief is unable to fulfill his duties. The president can only be removed if both the House and the Senate approve the request by a two-thirds vote. As powerful as this clause is, it's never been used.
5. Which states haven't ratified the 25th Amendment? In order for an amendment to become part of the U.S. Constitution, at least three-fourths of all states (38 states) need to ratify it. That happened on February 10, 1967. Eventually a total of 47 states ratified the amendment. Still, three states -- North Dakota, Georgia, and South Carolina -- did not ratify the 25th Amendment.

How do you feel about the assassination  of JFK?

Do you believe this a good amendment 

 

 

 

Do you feel as though anything should be change about the amendment? If so what would you change exactly?

 

Amendment 24

AMENDMENT XXIV

SECTION 1.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

SECTION 2.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


Fun facts:
The 24th amendment was important to the Civil Rights Movement as it ended mandatory poll taxes that prevented many African Americans. Poll taxes, combined with grandfather clauses and intimidation, effectively prevented African Americans from having any sort of political power, especially in the South. When the 24th amendment passed, five southern states, Virginia, Alabama, Texas, Arkansas, and Mississippi still had poll taxes. Most Southern states, at one time or another had poll taxes and in severe cases, had cumulative poll taxes that required the voter to pay taxes not just from that year, but also previous years they had not voted.



IN other words You used to have to pay a tax to vote. Not anymore. That simple.

Do you feel the poll tax was a bad idea to begin with?

Do you feel as though the Government at times taxes to much?

Amendment 23

AMENDMENT XXIII

SECTION 1.

The District constituting the seat of government of the United States shall appoint in such manner as the Congress may direct:

A number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a state, but in no event more than the least populous state; they shall be in addition to those appointed by the states, but they shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and Vice President, to be electors appointed by a state; and they shall meet in the District and perform such duties as provided by the twelfth article of amendment.

SECTION 2.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Simplified:

The 23rd amendment gives residents of Washington DC the right to vote for representatives in the Electoral College. Remember that the Electoral College chooses our next president, based on the voting within their state. Since DC is not a state, its residents were not allowed to vote for President as well as elected voting representative to Congress. Today, DC sends a delegate to Congress who may speak on behalf of those that live in DC, but that delegate may not vote.

The 23rd amendment passed Congress in June of 1960 and reached the ¾ approval threshold less than a year later, on March 23, 1961.

Do you feel as though the 23rd amendment is a fair representation of D.C. since they are in fact not a state.

Do you think there is anything wrong with it and it should it be changed in anyway or form?

Amendment 22

AMENDMENT XXII

SECTION 1.

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

SECTION 2.

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.

Fun Fact:
"Roosevelt is the longest serving president in American history (1933-1945). He was elected to an unprecedented 4 terms in 1944 but died in office in 1945, less than a hundred days after his inauguration. In 1951 a constitutional amendment was created (22nd amendment) which limited a president to just two terms."

Do you think the 22nd amendment is a good or a bad thing? Should a president if wanting to be able to run for a 3rd, 4th, or even 5th term?

Though it did not pass were you aware of the H.J. Res. 15. It was an attempt to repeal the 22nd amendment and give the president a chance to run for more then 2 terms. DO you think this is valid bill or no?

Amendment 21

AMENDMENT XXI

SECTION 1.

The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

SECTION 2.

The transportation or importation into any state, territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.

SECTION 3.

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions in the several states, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the states by the Congress.

Here are five interesting facts about the slow demise of Prohibition:

1. Two states rejected the 21st amendment. North Carolina and South Carolina rejected the amendment before December 5. So the vote was far from unanimous.

2. Another eight states didn’t meet before December 5 and didn’t even act to vote on the 21st Amendment: Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Dakota

3. One state didn’t end its version of Prohibition until 1966. Mississippi decided the keep its Prohibition laws for another three decades. As of 2004, half of Mississippi’s counties were dry. Currently, 17 states don’t allow any of their counties to be dry.

4. It was never illegal to drink during Prohibition. The 18th Amendment and the Volstead Act, the legal measure that included the instructions for enforcing Prohibition, never barred the consumption of alcohol–just making it, selling it, and shipping it for mass production (and consumption).

5. The Cullen-Harrison Act, signed about 10 months before the 21st Amendment was ratified, allowed people to drink low-alcohol content beer and wine. Incoming President Franklin D. Roosevelt had the Volstead Act amended in April 1933 to allow people to have a beer, or two, while they waited for the 21st Amendment to be ratified. The first team of Budweiser Clydesdales was sent to the White House to give President Roosevelt a ceremonial case of beer

In your opinion why do you feel the 18th amendment was actually ratified and fro what reasons?

Do you think Prohibition of anything can ever be an effective use to stop any specific thing being used?

Amendment 20

AMENDMENT XX

SECTION 1.

The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3rd day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.

SECTION 2.

The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3rd day of January, unless they shall by law appoint a different day.

SECTION 3.

If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

SECTION 4.

The Congress may by law provide for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the House of Representatives may choose a President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them, and for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the Senate may choose a Vice President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them.

SECTION 5.

Sections 1 and 2 shall take effect on the 15th day of October following the ratification of this article.

SECTION 6.

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission.


What all this means:
The 20th amendment is a simple amendment that sets the dates at which federal (United States) government elected offices end. In also defines who succeeds the president if the president dies. This amendment was ratified on January 23, 1933

Are you aware of the term Lame duck?

an elected official or group continuing to hold political office during the period between the election and the inauguration of a successor

Do you feel as though the 20th amendment has a bad stigma with it or no?

Amendment 19

AMENDMENT XIX

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


Fun  Fact:
The amendment granted women the right to vote. This right was known as women suffrage. Female citizens in the United States did not share the same rights as men when the United States was first founded. Following the convention there was a demand to allow women to vote and became the centerpiece of the women's rights movement. It allowed women to share in the same rights as men.

Do you believe this amendment changed everything about the way our society thinks or should think?

Even though women now have the right to vote do you believe that they are still seen as equals in society or is there still a long road to be traveled until they see equality? What is and what inst equal for men vs women in America?

Amendment 18

AMENDMENT XVIII

SECTION 1.

After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

SECTION 2.

The Congress and the several states shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

SECTION 3.

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several states, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the states by the Congress.

The 18th amendment is the only amendment to be repealed from the constitution. This unpopular amendment banned the sale and drinking of alcohol in the United States. This amendment took effect in 1919 and was a huge failure.

Its pretty clear that this Amendment did not last very long at all, why do you think this was so?

With tobacco and alcohol being legal but marijuana not, do you think this is right for the government to do? Why or why not? Why do you think marijuana is still illegal when science proves tobacco  and alcohol to be more unhealthy? 

Amendment 17

AMENDMENT XVII

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislatures.

When vacancies happen in the representation of any state in the Senate, the executive authority of such state shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, that the legislature of any state may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.

This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.

In short this amendment states that each state will have representation with two people. It also covers any abscesses that may occur.

Some people want the 17th amendment repealed as they don't like the idea that if the elected official votes not in favor of the state he will still be there for 6 years when before he could be immediately recalled. How do you feel about this?

Do you feel as though to much democracy could be a bad thing in reference to this? DO you feel as though this amendment is done so as just to make the people feel more involved? Why or why not?

Amendment 16

AMENDMENT XVI

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

The Why
The 16th amendment is an important amendment that allows the federal (United States) government to levy (collect) an income tax from all Americans. Income tax allows for the federal government to keep an army, build roads and bridges, enforce laws and carry out other important duties
.

Do you believe that the government takes advantage of the 16th amendment? Do they take to much money and in a wrong way? Are taxes all bad together? IF it can be fixed how would you propose it be done?

Do you believe taxes are pulling the american people down? Or is only a select of class that it is hurting? Do you think the tax system in america is fair?

Amendment 15

AMENDMENT XV

SECTION 1.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

SECTION 2.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.


A little history:
Many states were wary of the 15th amendment, mostly because they did not want Chinese and Irish immigrants voting. In fact, California and Oregon would not ratify the amendment due to the large amount of Chinese immigrants that lived there. It was not until almost 90 years later that these states would ratify the 15th amendment. The 15th amendment passed, without the support of these states, in 1870 and these protections largely helped African Americans, as long as there were federal troops to protect them.

How do you feel about the 15th amendment? Of course most will agree that it was simply a good thing but for many years there was still discrimination and women still couldn't vote at the time.

Even after all the fighting and even people dying for the right to vote, Do you believe that these people may in fact have died in vain? Do not enough people take the time to actually go out and vote?

Amendment 14

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2.

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

SECTION 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.



Four principles were asserted in the text of the 14th amendment. They were:
State and federal citizenship for all persons regardless of race both born or naturalized in the United States was reaffirmed.
No state would be allowed to abridge the "privileges and immunities" of citizens.
No person was allowed to be deprived of life, liberty,or property without "due process of law."
No person could be denied "equal protection of the laws."

Do you believe that though the 14th amendment is a law that provides equality among all, that  it is like this today. Do all people regardless of race, color, origin, sexual preference, and religion all have get treated equally by government? If not do you believe it will ever be equal?

 Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, which dictates that the "validity of the public debt of the United States ... shall not be questioned." Do you agree with this statement or no? Why or why not? Should the people be more aware or have more control over such an enormous thing that affects all of us?

Amendment 13

AMENDMENT XIII

SECTION 1.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

SECTION 2.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

In simplest terms no form of slavery is legal and the congress have the power to enforce this law of the land

Are you surprised to know that though Lincoln signed the bill the republican party in fact voted to abolish slavery whilst the democratic party did not? Do you think race is favored on one side of today's democratic and republic parties or one more guilty then the other?

Though slavery is now abolished do you think it still has affects on today's society? 

Amendment 12

AMENDMENT XII

The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.


Changed the way the President and Vice President are elected.

The 12th Amendment means:

- separate ballots are used for president and vice president.
- the candidates with the greatest number of votes for each office will be elected if that number constitutes a majority of the total electors.
- if a majority for the president is lacking, the House of Representatives shall vote by state from among the three highest candidates.
- if a majority for the vice president is lacking, the Senate shall vote by state from among the two highest candidates
- the vice president must meet the same constitutional requirements as provided for the president.


Do you think that it is fair that electoral vote not the popular vote actually chooses the president? Should it be instead the peoples directs vote that makes this decision?

Do you feel electoral votes are a fair representation of the people?

Amendment 11

AMENDMENT XI

The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.

 In other words, the Federal courts are limited and restricted from hearing lawsuits against any state's government that are brought by citizens of another state or foreign country. An example of this would be the State of New York enacting the Eleventh Amendment to protect itself from being sued in a Federal court by people living in the state, as well as residents of other states, or a foreign country.

In simplest terms the 11th amendment says that a state can't be sued by a citizen of another state.



Here is an explanation in the form of a Picture. Do you have any comments or concerns in relation to this amendment?

Do you think states can use this to their advantage if they wanted, or believe it has already been done?

Amendment 10

AMENDMENT X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

The Tenth Amendment, or Amendment X of the United States Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that basically says that any power that is not given to the federal government is given to the people or the states.

This is a debate in America as to rather the Federal government has the right to intervene with the usage of marijuana. What are you thoughts about this post?



Do you believe the states below in this video are correct in using the 10th amendment to back their claim?

Amendment 9

AMENDMENT IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

This means means that ANY rights you can think of AFTER the Founders wrote the Constitution are ours. The Federal Govt is restricted from doing anything that is not in the Constitution


Do you believe this is relation to the 9th amendment and an exercise of it?



For many this video below could be an eye opener and a deeper understanding of what the 9th amendment means. Would you agree or disagree with this video?

Amendment 8

8th Amendment

AMENDMENT VIII


Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Though this is an extreme example do you believe this picture is speaking about our justice system?

This is a interesting video on a discussion of if this serving dish they are giving at prisons is a violation of the 8th amendment. What do you think?

Amendment 7

SEVENTH AMENDMENT

AMENDMENT VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


If you are confused by what each line means, here are some good explanations to make the Seventh Amendment easier to understand:

“In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved”:

Defined: When the Seventh Amendment was written in the 1700's, $20 was considered a lot of money. Today, any disputes that involve amounts less than $75000 will not be handled in a federal court.

“And no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law”:
Defined: It is against United States law to setting up your own court system. If a person goes to court, he will always go to a court recognized by the government. These courts are often city, country, state, or national courts.

Below here is a video of people actually signing a petition to repeal; some of their rights. 

What do you think?

Amendment 6

SIXTH AMENDMENT

AMENDMENT VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Do you believe that one truly has an impartial jury during a case?

Below here is a video of a man and a judge. After watching it below do you believe he was denied his rights?

Amendment 5

U.S. Constitution › Fifth Amendment
FIFTH AMENDMENT

AMENDMENT V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


Below here is a video of a social Experiment. What are your thoughts about this video?

Below here is an aggressive on some of today's view of the 5th amendment. Do you believe it to be accurate?

Amendment 4

U.S. Constitution › Fourth Amendment
FOURTH AMENDMENT

AMENDMENT IV

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."


The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.  The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.

Whether a particular type of search is considered reasonable in the eyes of the law, is determined by balancing two important interests.  On one side of the scale is the intrusion on an individual's Fourth Amendment rights.  On the other side of the scale are legitimate government interests, such as public safety.


Do you think this picture is a good depiction of today's society?








Do you think the government has went to far with National Security?